Tuesday, April 28, 2015

Blood, Toil, Tears and Sweat

Paper One Textual Analysis – Political Speech

The text “Blood, Toil, Tears and Sweat” takes the form of a speech as it follows the stylistic conventions of a speech, with the use of rhetorical devices to further the speaker’s appeal. It was delivered by the, at the time, newly elected British Prime Minister (Winston Churchill) on his first entrance to the House of Commons with the presence of the outgoing one (Neville Chamberlain). 
            The target audience of the speech is primarily the British population as they were the ones who selected Churchill as their new prime minister and Churchill returning the favor by opening the speech with n insight on the work he has done so far as the new prime minister. However, the main purpose of the text is to rally up the British people’s support for Britain in the earlier stages of the war as Churchill emphasizes on how victory is their main aim, as well as to build up the people’s confidence in having Churchill as their prime minister.
            Churchill starts the speech by highlighting what he has done since being in office, this includes the forming of a new war cabinet, the appointment of individuals in key positions within the government. Churchill then states how the forming of the new administration was necessary and how he did it in a nick of time and he also addressed the public to have confidence in the new government. At this stage, Churchill transitions to his main part of the speech as he emphasizes on how vital victory in the war is to Britain and sticks with this subject till the end of his speech. Based on the speech, Churchill sees himself as an influential individual that will motivate Britain to its victory and he wants the public to see this as well. So it can be deduced that Churchill’s words of motivation is the theme of the speech.
            There are different elements in the text that affects the overall tone of the text. The sudden shift in tone halfway through the speech was resulted by a change atmosphere within the speech. At the beginning, the tone was rather terse. For the most part, Churchill was only listing what he has done and what is to be done by the parliament in chronological order. As opposed to the tone being preachy with lines like “Friend below the Gangway, have to be made here at home” and charismatic as Churchill starts using the word “we” more frequently in order to signify unity in Britain and get his message across on the second half of the speech. There is also a lot of repetition of the word “victory” and how important it was for Britain’s survival towards the end of the speech. As a whole, Churchill was often straight to the point in both parts so the overall tone would be urgent and the mood of the text would be empowering since this theme of victory is the overall basis of the speech.
            As previously mentioned, the overall purpose of the speech was to appeal to the audience and build up credibility towards the author in order to influence Britain to victory. Churchill builds up credibility in the beginning of the text as he describes the work he has done for the parliament as quoted “A number of other positions, key positions, were filled yesterday, and I am submitting a further list to His Majesty to-night.” and this appeals to the reader otherwise classified as ethos. Moving on with the persuasive technique, Churchill starts to include rhetorical devices with different effects. For example, Churchill uses an anaphora alongside a climax and parallelism, “but it must be remembered that we are in the preliminary stage of one of the greatest battles in history, that we are in action at many other points in Norway and in Holland, that we have to be prepared in the Mediterranean, that the air battle is continuous and that many preparations, such as have been indicated by my hon.” The use of climax was to emphasize the importance of the events going on at that instant in order of importance and therefore making it more appealing to the reader in order to engage them with the reader. Churchill does this over and over again, this time with the inclusion of a rhetorical question. “You ask, what is our policy? I can say: It is to wage war, by sea, land and air, with all our might and with all the strength that God can give us; to wage war against a monstrous tyranny,” the effects of the rhetorical device and question is the same as the previous indication.  As previously mentioned as the theme of the text, the word victory is often repeated. “You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word: It is victory, victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival.” it is implemented inside an anadiplosis in order to again emphasize the importance of victory for the Brits.
            Throughout the text, it is clear that Churchill wanted to emphasize victory and inspire the British people to glory as indicated in the previous paragraphs, starting with ethos to build credibility, then further developing the message with rhetorical devices and engaging the reader with rhetorical questions. Churchill was very successful in getting his message across and very appealing as the new British prime minister.

Monday, April 20, 2015

Meaningful Takeaway (An African Voice)


    Within the class discussion quite a number of points were raised, however the most relevant point was the effect Things Fall Apart had on other cultures and individuals. The group spent a fair bit amount of time discussing these points as they arise mainly due to the fact that almost everyone in the group had opinions on that specific part of the interview in An African Voice. As a whole, Things Fall Apart, for the readers, was somewhat relatable especially in the eyes of the colonized. Chinua  Achebe was surprised by this as he initially had no idea how the book was relatable to individuals in Korea and how the Korean readers were able mirror the colonization of Igboland to how the Japanese colonized Korea. The fact that Chinua Achebe was utterly surprised by his audience was also a topic raised in the discussion, however not the most meaningful takeaway.