Propaganda Poster

This propaganda poster is arguably one of the most appealing learner profile poster in the history of the IB, I will explain the reasons why that is the case throughout this rationale with an explanation of each individual feature that were hand-picked based on their relevance in contributing to the poster’s appeal.

Overall, this propaganda poster revolves around the idea of fear that was made clear by the headline.

Communication is key to survival

The fear-factor of this poster warns the audience that a disaster will result if they do not follow a particular course of action which is to communicate or to become a communicator. Furthermore, the use of language aspect surrounding this headline also has an apparent effect on the audience; such as the use of inclusive language, like we in we are here to help, which persuades the audience by creating a sense of responsibility or solidarity on the topic.

Despite the controversial use of

The learning outcome clearly states

We express ourselves confidently and creatively in more than

one language and in many ways. We collaborate effectively,

listening carefully to the perspectives of other individuals and

groups.

With emphasis on promoting the communicator learning outcome, the image and visual aspects / visual language of the poster contributes to the poster’s appeal. The visual aspect is a conversation which symbolizes express ourselves confidently, during a rescue mission depicting the collaborate effectively aspect of being a communicator, between the refugees and marines that symbolize individuals and groups, in both arabic and english (more than one language).

Propaganda

Throughout history, the term propaganda has always been heavily associated with a negative message, often not only an exaggeration of the truth but to the extent of an outright lie. Solely focusing on the idea of war, propaganda and bias has always played a key role in forming or perhaps altering the perception of the masses during these time periods.

 In response to the chosen prompt, as a student I agree that

The term propaganda always refers to a negative message. 

As previously mentioned, propaganda is mainly used to either exaggerate or alter the truth. To what extent should one simply alter the truth for positive reasons? I believe that being untruthful on it’s own is already a negative act, therefore it puts a negative aspect on the story or news headline.

The media’s use of propaganda during the Iraq war in 2003 is worth the discussion in this case to back up the statement above. In the documentary Control Room, there are many different examples of opposing perspectives on the same issue. The most important one being the conditions faced by the Iraqi population due to the war. From the observations made by Josh Rushing, he pointed out that Al Jazeera seemed to have mostly  depicted the sufferings of the people on the channel as opposed to the threats of Saddam Hussein. This exaggeration of the truth (message) might have had good intentions, to show that the conditions were bad for the people of Iraq but at the end, this refers to a negative message critiquing the United States involvement in Iraq.

Don’t take my word for it, but my point is that even though the intention behind altering the message (propaganda) in itself might be for the greater good, the message it provokes will always refer to a negative message.

This is Water

In David Foster’s essay ‘This is Water’ he argued that “true freedom acquired through education is the ability to be adjusted, conscious and sympathetic”.

     Breaking down this main argument that he puts forward during a commencement speech, he seems to have come to this conclusion through the observations he might have made of the population in general; in accordance to how people act, social norms and maybe through personal accounts. David Foster specifically refers to traits or perhaps qualities of great importance in human nature that people are lacking today’s society (adjusted, conscious and sympathetic) through the change our world has gone through since these qualities seems to have been overlooked by the modern day society.

     The fact that this essay was originally made for a commencement speech played an important role in forming David Foster’s thesis and that is where he really develops his thesis and explains the meaning behind it by using real-life examples and evidence that everyone understands. To put things into context, commencement speeches are spoken to university or college graduates as they say it in America on their graduation day, and there are many different messages conveyed through these speeches depending on the speaker, but usually it is to provide graduates small insights on the upcoming challenges of life or even (if you’re lucky) tips on how to deal with these challenges. 

     So based on his thesis, David Foster really emphasised freedom through education and that this freedom is meant to be achieved after going through all the years of study in school and university but real freedom, according to David Foster is different. To explain this he uses the example of a day-in day-out middle class worker’s life where a person might go through their day according to their personal schedule, personal necessities and personal view of the things going on around them and that this could develop the protagonist disease where one thinks that he/she is the centre of the universe (as if he/she were the main character to every story). Foster then quoted, 

     “But if you've really learned how to think, how to pay attention, then you will know you have other options. It will actually be within your power to experience a crowded, loud, slow, consumer-hell-type situation as not only meaningful but sacred, on fire with the same force that lit the stars — compassion, love, the sub-surface unity of all things.” 

     Basically, where he is getting at is that people need to be more open to perspectives in this world, embrace the reality that they are situated in through the freedom they have acquired through education with the ability to be adjusted, conscious and sympathetic.

     This relates to our inquiry question ‘How can literature develop empathy and emotional intelligence’ since literature enables us to take the role of different perspectives other than ourselves and help us to be more conscious and sympathetic.

Alice Munro IOC 2

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzpD1Rg_bKCsR1VIUXhlTDFCX2s/view?usp=sharing

Alice Munro IOC

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzpD1Rg_bKCsbGExVXk5UnBOdmM/view?usp=sharing

Last First 4 lessons Reflection

What is the purpose and benefit of the study of literature? 

I believe that the purpose of studying literature is to offer students a new perspective on literature, a deeper insight on the study as a whole and to allow them to input their perspectives in order to build an analytical perspective in students as they discover more about the world in the lens of writers, which in return benefits them by making room for a bigger and a better idea of the world.

What is women’s literature and what is the value in studying it? 

Women’s literature is a genre of literature that is written by women and it is generally written for or targeted at women since it provides a feminine perspective but women’s literature can also be found relatable by men. The value in studying women’s literature is again very similar to the values of studying literature in general. However because male authors are generally the norm, looking at women’s literature from an analytical standpoint is very valuable since the female gender are able to engage more and the males can definitely learn something new from a different perspective.

Why were the themes and values of Munro’s social realism so significant during the 1950s-1980s? 

The theme and values of Alice Munro’s stories is very significant to her audiences back then since back then, people within the same community pretty much share the same values and principles. In other words, life was simple (not necessarily easier) and writing about the any aspect of life is very significant and definitely something readers would engage with. 

Although she does not identify as a feminist writer, how has Munro’s work contributed to gender equality? 

Having established herself as a renowned female writer, Munro has paved the way for other feminists out there during her peak. Referring back to the previous question, her work as a writer contributes to the feminist movements going on in the 50s-80s although it might not have been the author’s intention

What do you enjoy most about the content of Munro’s work and what impact has it had on you?

For the most part, Munro’s short stories have shown a great insight on her values as writer and her ideologies. Her stories impact me almost indirectly since I often find it hard to focus less on the plot and engage more with the protagonists of the stories. So, I find myself relating the stories to people I know might relate to the stories better than I do. As a whole, yes her stories opened up my perspectives on some of the themes she discussed but that’s just about it. Maybe after a more thorough analysis of the stories, learning more about the author in class and reading them over, I might have a better understanding on its impacts and have more to say in terms of its influence. 

General Musing

        If there was one characteristic to tell someone about how people in Indonesia speak, it’s their willingness and ability to shorten the amount words they have to communicate. Indonesians believe that by shortening the amount of words they have to say in person, 

1. They gain more time to chat with people on their phones as opposed to the people around them
2. They type less words when they chat 

Upon my annual return to my home country, I have only recently noticed that Indonesians tend to form portmanteau words and utilise them in daily conversations. For those of you that do not know what a portmanteau word is, it is basically a combination of two words to form a new word, usually but not always by adjoining the first part of the first word and the last part of the second. Some common examples from the english language would be brainiac from the words brain and maniac and also bromance from brother and romance.   

Indonesia is a country comprised of more than 17,000 of islands with a population of more than 255 million people, it is one of the most linguistically diverse countries in the world with more than 700 languages being spoken to this day. While the official language of Indonesia is Bahasa, Javanese remains more widely spoken since it is the largest and most politically dominant ethnic group in Indonesia. 

         Although the portmanteau frenzy emerged in the capital city, the case was the same in my hometown as I continued my travel to the villages on a separate island up north called Sulawesi. I believe that because the portmanteaus were used in local Television, the villagers started to use pick up these words and as a result started to develop their own words within their surroundings and the community.  

        Based on my observations during my time in Indonesia, Indonesian portmanteaus are often either nouns or adjectives. To be frank I rarely make full observations on particular languages and draw comparisons, so this is definitely not my field of expertise. As a result looking at the use of portmanteaus in Bahasa Indonesia and its origins is a first of many firsts for me. 

*note

I am fully aware that “shortening words in casual speech” is a key characteristic that is not specific to Indonesian only but this post is only a general musing of mine based on my experience